SLIDESHOW EXPLANATION

THE PHOTOS SCROLLING BY IN THE SLIDESHOW ON THE LEFT ARE ORIGINAL AND CAN BE VIEWED OR PURCHASED AT WWW.WIZARDPIXPHOTOGRAPHY.COM

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

TAMPING DOWN EXPECTATIONS IS A FULL-TIME JOB ON THE EVE OF THE FIRST DEBATE...



             That's a drawing of a tamp bar in a hole in the ground.  If you've ever been on the business end of one of those bad boys, you already know how heavy and awkward they can be, especially when you're tired and frazzled.  In a previous life I had to put up about a thousand fence posts for a woman who raised horses, and I've seen more of that view than I care to recall... and still have scars from the blisters to prove it.

             But in political terms, "tamping down" means something else entirely.  Tomorrow marks the first debate in the 2012 Presidential Sweepstakes, and all eyes are on the performances of President Obama and his challenger Mitt Romney.  Every question posed by the moderator is a potential minefield for each of them, with any misstep to be dissected over and over on the cable news networks for days. 

             In a race this tight, any mistake could be huge.

             Both camps are trying to lower expectations for their guy, not wanting to seem overconfident or optimistic.  If you're carrying a swagger going in and come out with your tail between your legs, it can be devastating.

             So there's a lot of "tamping down" going on.  Romney's camp points to the President's famed oratory skills (despite the fact that Obama's a fairly poor debater) and Obama's team is pointing to Mitt's successful debate performances as an indicator of the juggernaut their guy faces tomorrow.

             In the end, it probably won't amount to a hill of dirt next to a fence post.  They'll both play to the center, avoid the self-inflicted gaffe, and if all goes well they'll shake hands at the end of the night and start spinning the results as soon as they leave the debate hall.

             I'm pretty sure I'll tune in, unless something else comes along that promises fewer scripted moments.

             You see, I've seen this tamp bar thing in action, and it's not as fun as it looks.


            

2 comments:

notacynic said...

Wouldn't it be nice if these debates were more than cheap entertainment?

squatlo said...

Notacynic, the trouble is, they're neither cheap nor entertaining.

The saddest part of this is the simple fact that the two candidates will never actually debate anything. They'll be forbidden from addressing one another directly, won't be allowed to make a point or counterpoint without the intervention of a moderator, and will have to "stay on script" in order to play by the rules.

Watching them sit across a table from one another and actually discuss issues would indeed be entertaining, and informative.

This is more like an elaborate Kabuki dance, or bullfight.